Carbon neutrality refers to a product that has net zero carbon emissions. The manufacture and use of corn-based ethanol has expanded based on the assumption that it’s carbon neutral and therefore far better for the environment than gasoline. However, several studies have shown that such assumptions are categorically false
From cars to food: many have noticed a distinct shift in attention of radical climate activists lately.
Food is squarely on the table as a subject of “unsustainable” so-called greenhouse gas emissions such as carbon and methane.
Among green energy advocates, coal is reviled as the dirtiest and smoggiest of fuels.
Roughly $2.8 billion will be invested this year to increase global energy supplies, with $1.7 billion, or about 60 percent, going to clean energy projects such as solar and wind generation, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has predicted.
The green energy movement is showing again how self-interest, propaganda and trying to regulate competition out of existence, are part and parcel of its radical agenda.
The world is poised at “the dawn of a new industrial age” of green energy and clean manufacturing, the International Energy Agency (IEA) proclaimed in a 10 January report.
If you’re a green energy company trying to grow your business, even though your technology can’t compete against natural gas, oil or nuclear power in the marketplace, what do you do?
They have to destroy the environment to save it. It’s one of those oh so inconvenient truths of the “green reset,” where the latest news is that Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos and other mega billionaires are funding rare earth projects in Greenland. Greenland, due to its formidably harsh climate and terrain, represents one of the...