|
|
For those who had tuned into the Celente & The Judge podcast on 5 January, the U.S. Supreme Court’s rejection of the Biden administration’s mandate that gave the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s the power to force private businesses that employ more than 100 employees to mandate their workers get the COVID Jabs, comes as no surprise.
In that podcast, a week before the Supreme Court’s decision, Judge Andrew Napolitano accurately had forecast that the Supreme Court would reject the Biden mandate.
PUBLISHER’S NOTE: Again to further illustrate how those in power are making COVID War rules up, just as they did with the “Flatten the Curve” crap that flattened nothing… How did the Biden administration arrive at the number 100 employees? Why not 99 or 107?
Why? Because moronic freaks called politicians are in control of a nation, state and city near you. Facts, data and science matter not in the new world of the power-hungry.
The court’s majority, which voted 6-3 in favor, wrote that the Biden administration’s vaccine-or-test requirements for these businesses were no “everyday exercise of federal power.”
“It is instead a significant encroachment into the lives—and health—of vast number [sic] of employees. We can’t expect Congress to speak clearly when authorizing an agency to exercise powers of vast economic and political significance. There can be little doubt that OSHA’s mandate qualifies as an exercise of such authority.”
The majority wrote that OSHA does not have a mandate from Congress to “regulate public health” for 84 million Americans “simply because they work for employers with more than 100 employees.”
The court’s majority said OHSA’s mandate is to concern itself with “work-related dangers.” But the justices pointed out that COVID-19 is not something that becomes a threat by simply going to work. The virus has become a hazard of “daily life.”
Eugene Scalia, the son of former Justice Antonin Scalia who served as the U.S. labor secretary, wrote in The Wall Street Journal that the court’s ruling “spells trouble for the administration’s plans more generally to exploit ambiguous statutory language to implement big economic or political change—like using financial regulation to curb climate change.”
The court also ruled in a 5-4 decision to allow medical facilities that accept Medicare and Medicaid dollars to enforce a vaccine mandate for employees.
The minority, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Amy Coney Barrett, criticized the ruling, saying that it is not their opinion that the “Federal Government is likely to be able to show that Congress has authorized the unprecedented step of compelling over 10 million health care workers to be vaccinated on pain of being fired.” (See “MAJORITY OF AMERICANS WOULD QUIT THEIR JOBS THAN TAKE THE JAB. WILL THEY BACK DOWN?,” “COURT BLOCKS BIDEN VACCINE MANDATE” and “BIDEN HOSPITAL VAX MANDATE LOSING SUPPORT.”)
The Biden administration has suffered legal setbacks tied to its coronavirus actions. In August, the White House admitted that it lacked the legal authority to extend the federal eviction moratorium after it expired in July. (See “RENTERS BEWARE: COVID EVICTION MORATORIUM ENDING.”)
The Supreme Court also ruled in August that the Biden administration’s attempt to end the Trump-era “Remain in Mexico” policy violated federal law.
TRENDPOST: Biden is seen as going further than any past American president to force vaccinations and he is basing his effort on protecting “vaccinated workers from the unvaccinated,” which naturally raises the question of the vaccines’ effectiveness.
Again, totally absent from the mainstream narrative, is that the public was sold the lie by the drug lords back in November of 2020, that if one gets the COVID Jabs, the odds are 96 percent in their favor never to get the virus.
But of course, that is not true, since the efficacy rate, according to the Israeli Health Ministry, is 39 percent. See “THE DARK SIDES OF THE VAX,” 24 Aug 2021.
TRENDPOST: The Trends Journal has reported extensively on the Biden administration’s efforts to get millions of Americans vaccinated. It is the White House’s position that the only way the country will emerge from the outbreak will be through mask compliance and vaccines. (See “MAJORITY OF AMERICANS WOULD QUIT THEIR JOBS THAN TAKE THE JAB. WILL THEY BACK DOWN?” and “BIDEN VAX MANDATE CONTESTED.”
Again, unquestioned by the media is the illogic of the President’s and others claim that the unvaccinated are threatening the vaccinated. Thus, if a person is vaccinated they are supposedly safe from catching the virus. So how can the unvaccinated give them the virus?