Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /bitnami/wordpress/wp-content/themes/the-newspaper/theme-framework/theme-style/function/template-functions.php on line 673

A Canadian judge told a father that his visitations with his 12-year-old child were temporarily suspended because he was not vaccinated—even though the child has received both jabs.
Judge J. Sébastien Vaillancourt, who is in Quebec province, decided at the end of last month that it is not in the child’s “best interest” to meet with the father given the number of cases in the province.
The legal problems reportedly started when the unidentified father sought to increase his visitation time with the child during the holidays. 
The BBC reported that the child’s mother informed the court about the man’s vaccine status and alerted the court to posts he made on social media that were in opposition to vaccines.
Vaillancourt reportedly took into account that the 12-year-old lives with two younger siblings who are not eligible to receive the vaccines. He also pointed out that the vaccines do not seem to be as effective in stopping the spread of the Omicron variant. 
He said it is “not in the best interests of any of the three children that [the father] can exercise access to [his 12-year-old child] at this time.”
Vaillancourt is not the first judge to consider vaccination status and parental visitation rights. A judge in Los Angeles County Superior Court mentioned that a father could lose his visitation rights over his vaccination status.
A divorced couple in Pasadena was in the middle of a bitter fight about whether their young son should take the COVID-19 vaccine. 
The unvaccinated father was opposed. 
The Los Angeles Times, which read the transcripts from the hearing, reported that Judge Harvey A. Silberman told the couple that the boy “absolutely” needs to be vaccinated.
He asked the parents if they were vaccinated and when the father said no, Silberman said, “Sir, you better get vaccinated, or you could very well lose time with your child unless you have a medical reason not to.”
The comment led to a debate in the legal community. John F. Banzhaf III, professor emeritus of public interest law at George Washington University Law School, told the paper that there is a precedent in court about limiting visitation over a parents’ behavior and pointed to how parents who were smokers were once treated. 
He said family courts have ordered parents who smoked to put their cigarettes down for up to 48 hours before their child visits to keep the child safe from second-hand smoke.
Lloyd C. Rosen, a lawyer representing a New York father in a similar position, said even if the father got vaccinated, it will not eliminate the risk of the child coming down with the virus.
“There’s just so many different ways this child could be exposed to COVID that to single out the father and make his access conditional upon his vaccination status is not only inappropriate but well beyond any kind of reasonable determination in the best interest of the child,” he said.
The court ruling stays in effect until February until the court re-evaluates the conditions in the province.
TRENDPOST: Once again, as we note in this week’s SUPREME COURT, SUPREME MORON article, jerks playing judges are making decisions that are contrary to hard data and scientific fact. 
No different in Canada. According to statista.com, to date, of 38,246,108 Canadians, the grand total of 14 children under the age of 12 have died of COVID over the past two years. 
Yet, the Canadian clown playing “judge” ignores the facts or is too stupid to understand them and deprives a father from seeing his children because he fears the kids—who are not dying from the virus, as we have continually detailed, at worst, may suffer minor symptoms—will die of COVID. 
TRENDPOST: To further illustrate the judge’s stupidity, in both Canada and the U.S., children are not dying from the virus. And since they are not, why are they being inoculated with the Operation Warp Speed gene therapy jab?  
As we have long been reporting but they are now finally admitting, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that less than 0.2 percent of Covid-19 deaths in the United States have been among children.  
Since the COVID War broke out in January 2020 to 6 January 2022, the CDC reports the grand total of 694 children aged 17 or younger that died of COVID… out of a population of some 74 million. And, 61 percent of those hospitalized were obese. There are 14.4 million obese children in the U.S., according to CDC estimates. 
Again, confirming what we have been reporting for nearly two years, the people that should be taken care of the most are the elderly and those suffering from pre-existing comorbidities. Over 75 percent of COVID deaths have been among seniors, and over 25 percent, some 200,000, of those COVID deaths were people aged 85 and older. 
Again, despite the fact that the virus is killing mostly those who are unhealthy, not a word about people getting in better health to fight the virus. Instead, all they do is sell the COVID Jab…which has greatly enriched the drug lords.  
TRENDPOST: The Trends Journal has reported extensively on the efforts of governments from around the globe to try and achieve 100 percent vaccination. 
Health officials insist that two jabs are no longer considered as effective in preventing illness and call on a third shot to be considered vaccinated. 
But vaccine critics point to a historic number of cases amid the most recent Omicron wave and record number of hospitalizations—even in the world’s most vaccinated cities. (See “PLAY SCRAMBLE: DOES OMICRON= MORONIC?” “OMICRON: WE DON’T KNOW IF VACCINES ARE EFFECTIVE, BUT YOU MUST TAKE THE JAB” and “VAXXED OR NOT, OMICRON’S GONNA GET YA!”)

Comments are closed.

Skip to content