Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

ELON, YEEZY, TRUTH SOCIAL, OH MY!

ELON, YEEZY, TRUTH SOCIAL, OH MY!

A trio of stories this week highlighted the trend of censored Americans becoming increasingly proactive in fighting for social media platform access.

Elon Musk re-committed his intentions to buy Twitter, a leading social messaging platform that infamously censored then-President Donald Trump during the 2020 election campaign.

Truth Social, meanwhile, a Trump backed alternate social media platform, which recently was approved for inclusion in the Google Play store, shot to number one as the most downloaded app on android phones and devices.

And just yesterday, rapper and social icon Kanye West—who now simply wants to be known as Ye—struck back at being banned from Twitter and Instagram by announcing a deal to purchase the Parler alternative social media platform.

“In a world where conservative opinions are considered to be controversial we have to make sure we have the right to freely express ourselves,” says Ye.

Ye’s social media ban followed comments he made that were termed anti-semitic by mainstream media and commentators.

One of Ye’s comments, according to ABC11.com, read:

“The funny thing is I actually can’t be Anti Semitic because black people are actually Jew also You guys have toyed with me and tried to black ball anyone whoever opposes your agenda.”

Legacy media outlets reacted with predictable pearl-clutching headlines regarding Ye’s Parler media play:

“Kanye West Is Buying Right-Wing Social Media Platform Parler”—Forbes

“Kanye West Will Acquire Parler, the Right-Wing Social Media Platform”—Observer

“Ye to Buy Controversial Social Networking App Parler”—Bloomberg

“Kanye West Buys MAGA Cesspit Parler After Getting Kicked Off Instagram and Twitter”—The Daily Beast

Bans Fostering Alternative Ecosystem

The Parler platform itself was taken offline following the January 6 Washington protests over election fraud, meddling and manipulation that MSM and tech companies actively abetted.

It was delisted from app stores, and its services, which relied on Amazon cloud, were suspended.

The Trends Journal has detailed those manipulations in many articles, including:

Censorship, shadow banning, outright bans and demonetization of mostly conservative and liberty-minded viewpoints on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and elsewhere, accelerated in 2020.

The actions of tech corporations, sometimes colluding with government partisans, constituted illegal election meddling, and a form of in-kind contributions to the Democrat Party, many believe. 

Those platforms receive special protections in federal law (so-called section 230) that shield them, as supposedly neutral information conduits, from legal liability regarding posted third party content.

The Trends Journal has predicted and chronicled the growing movement of political dissidents to establish more resilient communications, social networking and other services, in the face of tech company and corporate censorship.

For more on that, see: