Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

China Goes Ponzi

 


TRENDS THIS WEEK: China Goes Ponzi

By Gerald Celente
Trends Journal Publisher

When the Panic of ’08 hit, the United States — the financial and military police of the world — led the charge to stop the spread of economic terror. Under the command of US Secretary of Treasury Hank Paulson, orders were given to save too-big-to-fail banks and over-leveraged financial institutions drowning in red ink. On Oct. 3, 2008, President George W. Bush signed into law the Troubled Asset Relief Program that allowed the government to purchase assets and equities institutions had accumulated from engaging in a spectrum of dirty deals — deals for which they would pay minimal fines before being allowed to grow even bigger.

That was just the beginning of the massive money flows to come.

Newly elected President Barack Obama launched his $831 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.In short order, the Federal Reserve began its series of Quantitative Easing programs that ballooned its balance sheet from $500 billion to $3.5 trillion, while maintaining its Zero Percent Interest Rate Policy. The results of these cheap money flows are quantifiable: Gross Domestic Product on average has barely moved above 2 percent annually, the labor-force-participation rate has sunk to 38-year lows and real
household income is at 1989 levels – all while equity markets have
soared to new highs.

While America led the cheap-money charge, China, the
world’s second-largest economy, quickly followed with its brand of
monetary juice.

With demand for its exports weakening, the real estate market cooling, bank lending slowing and unemployed natives growing restless, China pumped some $600 billion in public spending and loosened bank-credit policies to boost lending to businesses and consumers. By mid 2012, with its economy juiced, the New China News Agency reported: “The Chinese government’s intention is very clear; it will not issue another large-scale stimulus plan to boost robust growth…” and it will not “use stimulus money to reach the goal of stable growth like they did last time because it’s unsustainable.”

How do you say Ponzi in Chinese?

In 2012, when its GDP was at 7.7 percent, the Chinese government said
it would not go below 7.5 percent. Yet, with imports and exports down
dramatically, this year’s first-quarter GDP fell to 7 percent, the slowest pace since 2009.

As China’s housing bubble continues to deflate, despite pledges not to “issue another large-scale stimulus plan,” minimum down-payment rates for home buyers have been cut, the central bank lowered the reserve requirement ratio for commercial banks twice this year and interest rates have been cut for the third time in six months.  As with the US and other nations whose equity markets have been boosted by money-pumping and low-interest-rate policies, the Shanghai Index has soared more than 100 percent over the past year.

Meanwhile, despite all the cheap money injected into economies across the globe, GDP growth remains tepid. Why? Because “…stimulus money to reach the goal of stable growth … is unsustainable.”

Gerald Celente is the founder and director of the Trends Research Institute in
Kingston, N.Y., and publisher of the Trends Journal and Trendsresearch.com. 

©MMXV The Trends Research Institute®