Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

WHAT IF YOUR ATTACKER SURRENDERS?

By Bradley J. Steiner, American Combato
Here indeed is a “first ever” question! It comes from a student who is a regular monthly visitor to all our web sites. We thought that this question—certainly deserving an answer—would be of serious interest to a lot of our regular readers; to include some teachers as well as students: 
“How do you recommend handling a situation where an attacker seems to quit and give up after you initiate resistance but have not yet dis-abled him? It seems cruel to ignore his ‘giving up’ and just clobber him, anyway.” 
First off, dismiss the “cruel” nonsense. What is cruel is starting violence against an innocent person. The only “cruelty” that we see is the attackers toward an innocent defender.
When someone initiates violence against another, except to preempt a dangerous, violent attack by an assailant, whatever he gets is his problem, his doing, and his responsibility.
We certainly do not suggest, recommend, or teach that force should be continued against an attacker once he has been neutralized and the danger is gone, but we believe that no proper defense has been achieved until and unless the danger is decisively ended, and the threat is gone. 
A violent offender is no longer a threat if: 

  • He turns and physically flees 
  • His intended victim has created an opportunity for himself to safely flee the scene of the attack, and fleeing is clearly a feasible option at the time 
  • He has lost the capacity and the will to be any further danger to the intended victim. We do not see how or why a mere verbal “I give up!” or “I’ve had enough!” or “Stop, I surrender!”, etc. should cause a defender to cease aggressive action. 

In COMPETITIVE SPORT, yes, it would be disgraceful and should be cause for immediate forfeiture of the contest to continue rendering punishment after one’s opponent gives up. But we are not concerned here with competitive sport or match contests.
An individual who is a violent felon ought to be assumed to be easily capable of lying, too. And the “words” that he utters should be ignored and dismissed (actually, your focus in defending yourself should be such that auditory exclusion takes place and you do not even hear the bastard!).
So long as that attacker remains physically capable and has not made any attempt to physically flee, continue your defensive actions. His words could easily be a ploy to give him a second to pull a knife or gun, or to recover and renew his attack against you—lethally. 
Any extralegal violent offender must be stopped decisively before the defender is justified in ceasing his countering force against that attacker. 
An individual who has initiated violence against an innocent person has NOT been “stopped decisively” just because he says that he “surrenders.” 
You can be badly, permanently injured—even killed—when you are set upon by a violent offender. This has nothing to do with sport! Take no chances. If his “surrender” is a trick, you might end up dead.

Comments are closed.