Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

U.S. ELECTIONS: A BILLIONAIRES’ CIRCUS

U.S. ELECTIONS: A BILLIONAIRES’ CIRCUS

In America, which was once called “The Land of Opportunity,” the only way to land in the top of the political field is for those paved with the most money. 

JB Pritzker, an heir to the Hyatt hotel chain with an estimated personal net worth of $3.6 billion, is fighting for his political career in Illinois as two other billionaires enter the fray with their candidates for governor.

Pritzker, a Democrat, is watching a Republican primary that includes two candidates with the financial backing that allows them to spend a near limitless amount to be elected.

Darren Bailey, who is backed by former President Donald Trump, has benefited from $9 million in donations from Richard Uihlein, a major Republican donor, according to Bloomberg. Richard Irvin, a black Republican candidate, benefited from $50 million from Ken Griffin, the hedge fund billionaire. A recent poll found that Bailey is leading Irvin by 15 percent.

The Financial Times reported that Pritzker has already spent $125 million of his own fortune to fund his campaign. Bloomberg pointed out that Pritzker helped improve the state’s fiscal outlook but he faces pressure from voters due to rising crime and the departures of major companies from the city, like Boeing, Caterpillar, and Griffin’s Citadel.

The FT, citing OpenSecrets, reported that the race could be the most expensive gubernatorial race ever.

The paper wrote that the race may also be a “litmus test” on how individual donors can “wield influence” by cutting enormous checks for their preferred candidate. These billionaires once had to funnel their money through political action committees, but a 2010 Supreme Court ruling ended that requirement.

The Trends Journal has reported on how the BIGS in the U.S. control the electoral system. (See “U.S. ELECTIONS: DUH-MOCK-RACY. BIG MONEY RULES.”)

The report said Pritzker is no stranger to spending millions on his campaign. He spent $171 million on his 2018 election victory, the report said.

Griffin, who is worth $26.3 billion, and Pritzker have been adversaries and the hedge fund billionaire said he is “all in” to defeat the governor, Politico reported. 

TREND FORECAST: As we reported on 20 April 2021, the “WALL ST. GANG SPENT $3B ON 2020 ELECTION CAMPAIGNS.”  In this case, Republicans got 47 percent of the dough and Democrats, which play the “liberal” line, pulled in 53 percent of the money. 

Plain and simple, without big money behind a candidate running for office, the chances of beating one of the two party mobsters is slim and none. (See “POLS EMBRACE CRYPTO CAMPAIGN FUNDING” and “HOW BIG TECH MAINTAINS ITS MONOPOLY.”)