|
|
When it comes to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and that agency’s director, Dr. Rochelle “Pending Doom” Walensky, there are things you can count on and things you probably shouldn’t.
The agency and its director can be counted on to issue public statements, directives and guidelines, especially regarding the COVID-19 virus, that state and local governments and health authorities are expected to follow, and which affect the day-to-day lives of all Americans.
But those statements, directives and guidelines probably shouldn’t be counted on to remain operative for very long. Rather, they should probably be counted on to be withdrawn, “walked back,” revised or even reversed.
One example of this was seen on 27 July, when the agency declared, in a reversal of the guidelines it had issued in May, that fully vaccinated people were still at risk of contracting “breakthrough” infections, still capable of spreading the virus, and should therefore go back to wearing masks indoors in most areas of the country.
Rep. Peter Meijer (R-Michigan) charged that the CDC’s latest mask reversal had been informed by two unpublished studies plus a study from India of Delta variant transmissibility in which the subjects had received a non-U.S. vaccine.
Responding to criticism of that reversal the CDC cited an outbreak on 3 July in Provincetown, Massachusetts; over 400 people were infected, of whom 75 percent had been fully vaccinated. The agency said that information had been “pivotal” in changing its mask policy. (See, “VAX FAILURE FACTS. HAS THE HERD REACHED IMMUNITY? VARIANTS ON THE HORIZON?”)
But an even more recent example of the CDC’s “communication problem” occurred on 30 July. Appearing on Fox News TV program “Special Report,” Walensky was asked if she favored mandating COVID vaccinations on a federal level.
Walensky responded by saying “That’s something that I think the administration is looking into. It’s something that I think we are looking to see approval of from the vaccine,” and then reiterated that “We are looking into those policies.”
Later that same day Dr. Walensky “walked back” her remarks, emphatically stating (via Twitter), “To clarify, there will be no nationwide mandate. I was referring to mandates by private institutions and portions of the federal government. There will be no federal mandate.”
TRENDPOST: Trends Journal showed readers what to expect of Dr. Walensky in May 2021’s “COVID FRAUDSTER.” When Walensky does a 180, it’s not “waffling” or “flip-flopping.” Rather, it’s that “our guidance is evolving as the science evolves.”
When Walensky issues a statement, be prepared for it to be followed by some version of “Oops! Never mind what I said yesterday!” Indeed, as we have noted with scientific fact, the mandates of wearing masks, social distancing, Plexiglas separations, sanitizing surfaces, etc., have not only proven ineffective… as Gerald Celente has stated, “They make this crap up.”
And as the facts show, that is precisely what governments around the world have done. Again, as we noted with the latest round of Australian shelter-in-place lockdown, people are being forced to stay indoors while the chances of catching the virus outdoors are around 1 percent… or less.