Is Generative AI complementing knowledge workers, or more often, displacing them?
That’s the subject of a newly published study by researchers at the University of Washington at St. Louis.
Is Generative AI complementing knowledge workers, or more often, displacing them?
That’s the subject of a newly published study by researchers at the University of Washington at St. Louis.
The Australian military is now funding experiments that subject lab-grown human brain cells for use as “organoid” computer chips to power Artificial Intelligence.
Geothermal energy’s champions point to enormous amounts of energy locked in hot rocks under the ground: we drill down, pipe hot water down into the rocks to make steam, and collect the steam to spin turbines and generate electricity.
Officials and “experts” are now beginning to argue that developing “safe and compliant” generative Artificial Intelligence is being made more difficult, due to human created “misinformation” and “disinformation.”
Google wants journalists to have their own specialized AI assistant.
It’s called Genesis.
What’s an aspiring AI company that’s trying to go along to get along, going to do when it finds that its AI is committing “dangerous” and “harmful” acts, as defined by government ideologues?
In the course of writing this week’s article about EV technology, I had a fascinating exchange with Google’s generative text based AI, called Bard.
Just in time for July 4th, a Federal court judge in the Missouri vs. Biden court case issued a pro First Amendment ruling.
The brave new world is rushing at us faster than ever. Technocrats are impelled by an ideology of science-fueled “progress” to attempt to exert more comprehensive and precise control over all phenomena and environments.
Using deep-learning neural net AI to mine public (and certainly other) data, and report on travelers to government agents?