PFIZER CEO: THIRD TIME IS A CHARM

Go back to when so-called health experts, politicians, and the media began selling the COVID Jab. The line was that after two jabs, you’d live happily ever after, COVID-free for the rest of your life.
In a blink of a Drug Lord’s eye, that line changed.
Last Friday, this was the CNBC headline:

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said people will ‘likely’ need a third dose
of a COVID-19 vaccine within 12 months of getting fully vaccinated

Earlier this month, Pfizer put out a press release stating its clinical trial showed the vaccine to be effective six months after a second shot. But the CNBC report clarifies that “more data is still needed to determine whether protections last after six months.”
Bourla also stated, “It is extremely important to suppress the pool of people that can be susceptible to the virus.”
If that doesn’t cheer you up, how about having to get on line EVERY YEAR to ensure safety from the coronavirus?  
According to the CNBC report, “Bourla said it’s possible people will need to get vaccinated against the coronavirus annually.”
He’s not the only drug dealer CEO to be pushing the annual jab:
“The comment comes after Johnson & Johnson CEO Alex Gorsky told CNBC in February that people may need to get vaccinated against COVID-19 annually, just like seasonal flu shots. Researchers still don’t know how long protection against the virus lasts once someone has been fully vaccinated.”
In sequence with Bourla’s forever shot proclamation, David Kessler, President Biden’s chief science officer, told a House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis:
“We don’t know everything at this moment. We are studying the durability of the antibody response… It seems strong but there is some waning of that and no doubt the variants challenge… they make these vaccines work harder.”
TRENDPOST: As for these new reports from big drug dealer CEOs saying third doses are likely needed and people should be prepared to get vaccinated for COVID every year, there is solid, scientific reasoning to question whether their profit motives outweigh their concern for the public’s health. 
As stated clearly in a 2012 article published in The Independent,
“The multi-billion-dollar pharmaceutical industry has spent the last decade developing new drugs which have produced little benefit and caused considerable harm, experts say today.”  
The article cited data showing drug companies spend significantly more on advertising and promotion than they do on research for new and better medicines. The article was titled, “Drugs companies putting profit ahead of medical discoveries, warn scientists.”
Yet those who are hesitant to get vaccinated are called “irrational” and “conspiracy theorists” for doubting pharmaceutical companies and refusing to be jabbed with a vaccine that has not been tested for long-term reactions and has questionable efficacy. 
In addition, despite the FDA, which is supposedly vigilant in its protection of the American public, it has backed the big drug dealers’ drugs that the CDC says are deadly: “Prescription drugs have become the fourth leading cause of death in the U.S. They kill more Americans than breast cancer, prostate cancer, homicide, and suicide combined.”
And Harvard University confirms that “When you start a new drug, you have a 1 in 5 chance of having a major health problem caused by the medication.”

Comments are closed.

Skip to content