Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

NEW FUND TRACKS DOWN IDEAS THAT ARE “OUT THERE”

Science is inherently conservative. Scientists with novel ideas typically can’t get research or development funding until they can show some evidence an idea is sound—and they can’t show an idea is sound until they have funding to chase it down.

That’s where Linked-In co-founder David Sanford comes in.

Sanford has recruited donors, including his Linked-In partner Reid Hoffman and Bill Gates, and set up the Hypothesis Fund, which will disburse $300,000 in seed funding over the next 12 months to ideas that conventional science finds too weird to pay attention to.

So if he can’t rely on conventional science for advice on which ideas to fund, how will he decide which notions he should back?

He won’t.

Instead, he’s recruited 17 mid-career scientists from various fields whom he sees as competent, innovative, and having a taste for the unusual in their areas of expertise. 

Each has carte blanche to give money to as many as three researchers he or she thinks has a unique idea that could turn out to matter.

The criteria: the idea has to be unusual, something that helps people deal effectively with risks, promotes diversity, and can be completed within 18 months. 

With the money already in the fund, Sanford expects to bankroll as many as 100 projects over the next 24 months.

TRENDPOST: The Hypothesis Fund isn’t the first to hunt down novel notions in science. One is being organized in the Netherlands and the U.S. National Institutes of Health has a little money set aside to test strange but attractive notions.

The pace at which science is accumulating new knowledge, and at which it’s changing, is blurring the line between what’s too strange to think about and something that might actually prove out.

More such funds will be created, by institutions as well as by billionaire entrepreneurs.