|
Dr. Anthony Fauci appears to have been caught in yet more lies concerning his activities while serving as a top policy czar during the COVID war.
And this time, the controversy involves statements he made while being deposed under oath as part of the Missouri vs. Biden court case.
Specifically, Fauci has repeatedly claimed to have no access to Twitter, and no idea of how to accomplish “tweeting.”
In the Missouri vs. Biden deposition, Fauci said regarding his lack of Twitter involvement:
“I don’t have an account. I don’t tweet. I don’t pay attention to social media. I wouldn’t know how to access a tweet if you paid me.”

But according to info revealed as part of a new Twitter Files release, Fauci appeared to control info that went out on a Twitter account, at the very least in terms of directing what information was posted on those accounts.
Journalist Paul D. Thacker, breaking down the internal Twitter information in a detailed thread, noted, with documentation:
4) But in an internal Twitter report in March 2021, the company revealed “Dr. Anthony Fauci did an account takeover for @WHOCOVIDResponse.”
This runs contrary to Fauci’s public statements and sworn deposition given on Nov 23, 2022.
Thacker also posted info that showed Fauci “took over” the account again in April:
5) According to this tweet, Fauci took over the White House COVID-19 Response account again, in April 2021.
The thread contained other troublin info regarding Twitter employee biases supporting Fauci’s actions as a leading but controversial figure shaping COVID war policies surrounding medicines, lockdown recommendations, protocols like mask wearing and social distancing, shuttering of “non-essential” businesses, vaccine mandates, and more.
And that doesn’t even get into the thorny issues surrounding Fauci’s involvement in funding dangerous gain-of-function research, including funding that went to the Wuhan China bio lab that several U.S. agencies now say was the likely origin point of the virus outbreak.
Fauci has also been implicated in trying to steer the course of an early evaluation of whether the COVID virus may have come from the Wuhan lab.
Fauci’s court deposition was compelled as part of a case brought by several state attorneys and other plaintiffs who have alleged illegal government suppression and censorship of Constitutionally protected free speech and political rights of Americans.
Other Revelations Show Twitter Helped Shape Vaccine Promotions
In this latest Twitter Files release, Thacker also highlighted partisan involvement of Twitter in helping pharmaceutical company Johnson & Johnson develop a “marketing strategy” to promote its COVID vaccine:
11) During that same time frame, Twitter began working with Johnson and Johnson on a COVID-19 vaccine “marketing strategy” and with CVS pharmacy to promote approved narratives.
The full Twitter Files release can be viewed here.
The Trends Journal covered Fauci’s deposition in the Missouri vs Biden case, and predicted the case would have significant impacts, in articles including “FIRST AMENDMENT SHOWDOWN: MISSOURI VS BIDEN” (13 Oct 2022) and “FAUCI IN DEPOSITION: ‘I DON’T REALLY RECALL’ APPROVING EXCEPTION THAT ALLOWED ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE TO CONDUCT DANGEROUS VIRUS EXPERIMENTS” (6 Dec 2022).
You must be logged in to post a comment.