Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

LOOKING FOR COLLUSION? TRY GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK

Another week, another revelation of mega corporations engaging in illegal practices to hurt consumers and undercut competition.
This time the news is about two of the largest current controllers of online advertising, Google and Facebook (now Meta), conspiring together to swallow the pie and keep challengers out.
Specifically, according to newly revealed papers of a state antitrust  complaint, the companies worked together to distort internet advertising sales, and CEOs at both firms were aware of the agreement and approved it.
The agreement reportedly set prices on advertising to avoid bidding wars between the two online ad giants.
The case was filed in December 2021, led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and was joined by the attorneys general of Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah.
But new unredacted versions of case documents, reported on by the AP, The Guardian, and other outlets, contains more detailed information on Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s roles in the deal’s approval.
In a 2018 email exchange discussing the deal, Facebook’s chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, was “clear that ‘this is a huge deal strategically,'” according to the complaint. 
The complaint claims that once the two parties worked out the parameters of the agreement, “the team wrote an email addressed directly to CEO” Zuckerberg.
“We’re nearly ready to sign and need your approval to move forward,” the email read, according to the complaint. Zuckerberg wanted to meet with Sandberg and his other executives before making a decision, the complaint states.
Google even used a secret code name, “Jedi Blue,” to refer to the 2018 agreement internally.
Unsurprisingly, spokespeople for both companies are denying wrongdoing. One even spun the agreement as an effort to increase “fairness” to advertisers.
“These business relationships enable Meta to deliver more value to advertisers while fairly compensating publishers, resulting in better outcomes for all,” Meta’s Chris Sgro asserted.
The Trends Journal has been extensively reporting on anti-competitive and other abuses and illegal activities of corporations. For further reading, check out:

Comments are closed.