Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

DON’T BANK ON BANKING JOBS

To add insult to already shrinking bankster-profit injury, HSBC has announced it will slash 10,000 jobs, eliminating over 4 percent of its workforce. This follows the 60,000 layoffs this year by Deutsche Bank, Barclays, Citigroup, and others.

The next decade looks grim for all banking staff in the branches, call centers, and corporate headquarters. 

In addition to positions being dropped in the name of “redundancy,” analysts say advances in automation, such as chatbots, will cause an estimated 200,000 lost jobs over the next ten years, the biggest reduction of jobs in banking history.

TRENDPOST: As we go to press, Federal Reserve Chairman, Jerome Powell, announced QE4, but he wouldn’t call a spade a spade.  “This is not QE. In no sense is this QE,” he said, referring to the Fed’s pumping in more cheap money in the troubled overnight lending markets.

Some two weeks ago, when the repo markets were short of cash and interest rates spiked from around 2 percent to 10 percent, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York said they would keep the money flowing until 10 October.

Then, last week, when the overnight money junkies needed more monetary methadone, the NY Fed said they would keep the fix going utill November, as we reported in the 1 October issue of the Trends Journal.

Zero Hedge, a “markets-focused” blog, claims the real reason the Fed is injecting more money into the system is because “the US [is] facing an avalanche of debt issuance and with China and Japan barely able to keep up, someone has to buy this debt. That someone: the Fed.”

The Feds action and central banks money-pumping schemes will not save failing economic systems.

As we noted, since they launched QE and zero interest-rate policy following the Panic of ‘08, the data proves they only enriched the One Percent at the expense of the workers of Slavelandia.

On 7 October, the Bank of International Settlements confirmed our analysis, writing that “the unprecedented growth in central banks’ balance sheets since the financial crisis has had a negative impact on the way in which financial markets function.”

TREND FORECAST: The more cheap money backed by nothing and printed on nothing that flows into the systems, the higher gold prices will spike.

While our long-stated forecast was for gold to steadily rise to $2,000 per ounce this year and early next year, considering these new rounds of aggressive monetary stimulus measures being taken by governments and central banks globally, a range of $3,000 to $5,000 per ounce is on the horizon.