CDC VS BIG PHARMA: COVID BOOSTER SHOTS FOR ALL?

In this issue, we reported on findings by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices about heart inflammation showing up as vaccine side-effects (See, YET ANOTHER REASON FOR VACCINE HESITANCY).
But also reported by CNBC on 23 June are more of that same committee’s findings, this time on the need for COVID vaccine booster shots.
While the CDC is recommending that the COVID booster shots may be beneficial to more vulnerable segments of the population, such as the elderly, transplant recipients or persons with weakened immune systems, there are currently no plans for them to recommend or call for booster shots for the general population.
This is in stark contrast to what we were told by America’s so called preeminent COVID authority, Dr. Anthony Fauci, as in our 1 June 2021 article, “FAUCI DECLARES TWO COVID JABS NOT ENOUGH.” We also reported his other “pearls of wisdom”  in July 2020’s “FAUCI THE FEARMONGER.” Booster shots have also been a big part of Pfizer’s and BioNTech’s plans to keep supplying the world with a steady stream of COVID vaccines through at least 2023, as we reported on 8 June in “DRUG LORDS’ VAX BOOM BOOMING.”
In fact, in April, the head of Pfizer said it’s possible people will need to get vaccinated against the coronavirus annually.
He’s not the only drug dealer CEO to be pushing the annual jab:
The comment comes after Johnson & Johnson CEO Alex Gorsky told CNBC in February that “people may need to get vaccinated against COVID-19 annually, just like seasonal flu shots. Researchers still don’t know how long protection against the virus lasts once someone has been fully vaccinated.”
TREND FORECAST: With the CDC and other “health experts” selling the newer, more dangerous COVID variants such as the Delta variant, we forecast they’ll change their tune.
As for these new reports from big drug dealer CEOs saying third doses are likely needed and people should be prepared to get vaccinated for COVID every year, there is solid, scientific reasoning to question whether their profit motives outweigh their concern for the public’s health.
As stated clearly in a 2012 article published in The Independent, “The multi-billion-dollar pharmaceutical industry has spent the last decade developing new drugs which have produced little benefit and caused considerable harm, experts say today.”  
The article cited data showing drug companies spend significantly more on advertising and promotion than they do on research for new and better medicines. The article was titled, “Drugs companies putting profit ahead of medical discoveries, warn scientists.”
Yet those who are hesitant to get vaccinated are called “irrational” and “conspiracy theorists” for doubting pharmaceutical companies and refusing to be jabbed with a vaccine that has not been tested for long-term reactions and has questionable efficacy.
In addition, the FDA, which is supposedly vigilant in its protection of the American public, has backed the big drug dealers’ drugs that the CDC says are deadly: “Prescription drugs have become the fourth leading cause of death in the U.S. They kill more Americans than breast cancer, prostate cancer, homicide, and suicide combined.”
And Harvard University confirms that “When you start a new drug, you have a 1 in 5 chance of having a major health problem caused by the medication.

Skip to content