Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

CDC: FACE MASK MANDATE DECEPTION

According to the new CDC findings released on Friday, it concludes that mask mandates were associated with an average 1.32 percent decrease in the growth rates of COVID-19 cases and deaths during the first 100 days after the mask policy was implemented.
That’s it. Yet, despite a measly 1.32 percent decrease in stopping the coronavirus from spreading, much of the nation and most of the world have imposed strict mask-wearing mandates. 
Indeed, to promote fear and hysteria, on 5 March, AP led off with the headline:

Study Finds Mask Mandates, Dining Out Influence Virus Spread

Their summary of the CDC’s report states:
“Mandating masks was associated with a decrease in daily COVID-19 case and death growth rates” and “allowing on-premises restaurant dining was associated with an increase in daily COVID-19 case growth rates.”
Masked-Up For What?
The facts of the study prove, however, that the decrease in infections from wearing a mask was negligible, as were the increases based on dining indoors. 
Regarding masks, the report showed that:
“Mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease in daily COVID-19 case growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.1, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.8 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after.
Mask mandates were associated with a 0.7 percentage point decrease (p = 0.03) in daily COVID-19 death growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.0, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.9 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation.”
The Deception
It should also be noted that the CDC issued a report last September showing of those studied who contracted COVID-19, 85 percent either always or almost always wore a mask. 
As the Trends Journal has been reporting for months, there is ample evidence that masks do not prevent the spread of the coronavirus. 
See some of our articles: 
MASK UP AND DIE?
MASK MADNESS CONTINUES
FACING THE TRUTH, PART I: THE GREAT MASK-QUERADE
In addition, not mentioned in the AP article is the fact that prolonged mask-wearing is causing significant health issues from skin infections (“maskne”) and persistent coughing to serious respiratory illnesses.
See some of our past articles on the negative health effects of mask-wearing:
WEAR MASKS, GET SICK
FACING THE TRUTH, PART III: MASKS CAUSE HEALTH PROBLEMS
GERMAN DOC: MANDATORY MASK-WEARING IS “CRIMINAL”
As for the increase in infection rates based on indoor dining, again the claims are flimsy. According to the new CDC report: 
“During the study period, states allowed restaurants to reopen for on-premises dining in 3,076 (97.9%) U.S. counties. Changes in daily COVID-19 case and death growth rates were not statistically significant 1–20 and 21–40 days after restrictions were lifted… 0.91.2 and 1.1 percentage point increases in the case growth rate 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after restrictions were lifted. Allowing on-premises dining at restaurants was associated with 2.2 and 3.0 percentage point increases in the death growth rate 61–80 and 81–100 days, respectively.”
TRENDPOST: In effect, the cost of masking up, according to the CDC, is not worth the price. The AP article concludes with the CDC report, which states, “Prohibiting on-premises restaurant dining might assist in limiting potential exposure to SARS-CoV-2; however, such orders might disrupt daily life and have an adverse impact on the economy and the food services industry.”
Note the key phrase: “might assist in limiting exposure” when the facts show the exposure limit is minuscule.

Comments are closed.