Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

CANADIAN JUDGE: THROWING A PARTY COULD BE A CRIME

The Canadian Press published an article last Friday about a provincial judge, Ellen Gordon, when sentencing a citizen to one day in jail and a $5,000 fine for the minor infraction of failing to comply with a health officer’s order and unlawfully purchasing alcohol, added the heavy threat of potential manslaughter.
The man being charged was accused of holding a party for about 80 people in a condominium. 
The judge referred to the event as “a crime, not a party,” and scolded the accused:
“If someone who had been at your party was infected and died, as far as I’m concerned, you’re guilty of manslaughter. If someone who had been at your party was infected and passed it on to grandma, as far as I’m concerned, you’re guilty of manslaughter.”
According to the article, the accused man, Mohammed Movassaghi, “apologized to the judge and to the public for his ‘grievous error of judgment.’” The article reported that the chastened Mr. Movassaghi has since been “following the public health orders to a ‘T’ including adhering to the mask mandate.”
Some Canadian legal experts agreed with the judge. Professor Lisa Durfaimont of York University law school stated, “When you do a dangerous act that’s also a lead offence under the legislation, and if that were to lead to someone’s death, that could be manslaughter.”
A manslaughter charge could result in life in prison.
The article did note that another law professor, Isabel Grant, who teaches at the University of British Columbia’s law school, responded, “I think it’s technically possible that the Crown could substantiate a manslaughter charge, but I think it’s highly unlikely.”
TRENDPOST: We note this article not only to illustrate the intensity of the COVID War, the loss of freedoms, and the extreme punishments for those disobeying lockdown rules, but also the overt government hypocrisy. 
Using the judge’s one-sided logic, it would then hold true that she should declare the companies that keep pumping trillions of tons of chemicals and pesticides into our food, water, air, and earth “guilty of manslaughter.”
Of course, that won’t happen. As the Trends Journal has been noting for years, it is punishment to the fullest extent of the law for We the People and a slap on the financial wrist for big corporations, the Wall Street Gang, and the Bankster Bandits for their crimes against humanity.

Comments are closed.