CALIFORNIA TO REQUIRE MASKS IN SCHOOLS DESPITE FEDERAL HEALTH GUIDELINES

California plans to force all in-person students to wear masks in the fall despite guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
“Masking is a simple and effective intervention that does not interfere with offering full in-person instruction,” Mark Ghaly, the secretary of California Health and Human Services Agency, said. “At the onset of the new year, students should be able to walk into school without worrying about whether they feel different or singled out for being vaccinated or unvaccinated—treating all kids the same will support a calm and supportive school environment.”
Ghaly said that some schools in the state cannot accommodate the three feet social distancing that is recommended by the CDC. The health body has also advised against requiring vaccines for teachers and eligible children.
The Los Angeles Times reported that L.A. County has urged residents to continue to wear masks indoors regardless of their vaccine status. There has been an uptick in the county. There were 1,107 reported new cases last week compared to 549 the previous week. The paper said there are 320 people hospitalized as of Sunday morning compared to 280 at the same time last week.
The Times reported that schools will accommodate students who cannot manage masks or who have disabilities.
TRENDPOST: As for the mask mandates, we have been reporting on their ineffectiveness and health dangers since the COVID War began. Plus, data proves they are harmful for children, but this is being ignored by the California “health experts” and the low-life media Presstitutes. (See, “STUDY: MASKS HARMING CHILDREN”). 
And here are just a few of the many articles of both the dangers and ineffectiveness of mask wearing: MASK MADNESS; FACE MASKS: DANGERS & THE DEMENTED; MASKS OR NO MASKS? THAT IS THE QUESTION; UNMASKING THE TRUTH (PART II).
TRENDPOST: As we have reported in this (See, VAX KIDS? THE COVID RISK IS “TINY”) and previous Trends Journals, COVID-19 data concludes that the risk for people 1 to 20 years of age of dying from the virus is “tiny” in that the recovery rate is around 99.996 percent. 
We reported that during the first year of the virus only 25 individuals under the age of 18 died from the virus in England. Of those, 15 had “life-limiting or underlying health concerns.” Of those, 13 were “living with complex neuro-disabilities.”
The University College London and the Universities of York, Bristol, and Liverpool reported that there are about 12 million children in England, so the statistics show an “overall mortality rate of 2 per million children.”
Yet, mandates are being imposed on segments of the population that are not threatened by the virus and at this time, there is little unified resistance to impose these inhuman penalties being imposed on both children and adults.