Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

BATTERY WARS: A LIQUID REPLACEMENT FOR LITHIUM

Influit, a start-up spun off of the Illinois Institute of Technology, has unveiled the latest entry in the contest to replace lithium batteries. The company refers to its creation as “nanoelectrofuel.”

It’s a version of a flow battery—a cell in which two chemical solutions flow past each other on opposite sides of a membrane, transmitting electrons and creating an electrical current.

However, flow batteries don’t generate a lot of energy for their size, so they tend to be huge and suitable only for grid-scale power storage.

Part of the problem: active battery material settles to the bottom of the tanks instead of staying afloat.

Influit says it has solved the problem by suspending nanoparticles of active battery material in a fluid. The nano-size keeps the particles from settling. Also, the particles’ surface has been designed so the nanobits don’t stick together to make sludge.

As a result, Influit’s flow batteries can be scaled down for use in a car, truck, or airplane.

When the battery loses its charge, it can be re-energized by popping out an old “fuel pod” and slipping a new one—or the battery can be plugged in and recharged from a wall socket, the way electric vehicle batteries are now.

The batteries use no lithium or other rare or costly minerals, the company says, making them much cheaper than lithium batteries while they also can yield 23 percent more power per charge than today’s electric car  batteries, Influit claims.

The nanoelectrofuel also poses no danger of fire or an explosion in case of a crash. 

Pouring the battery’s contents onto a fire will simply extinguish the blaze, Influit says.

Influit already has made a practical demonstration of its technology and refueling system using a utility vehicle supplied by a partner company in the flow battery’s commercialization.

With substantial funding from NASA, Influit is now at work on an advanced version of the battery it says will boast four to five times the energy density of current lithium batteries and cost two-thirds less.

TRENDPOST: Influit’s battery faces a higher hurdle than many lithium replacements do: the battery has four chambers, two to separately handle the live and spent versions of each of the two battery fluids.

This makes it a less likely candidate to become the next EV battery of choice.

However, by reconceiving flow batteries, Influit makes them more widely useful across a range of applications.

Comments are closed.