Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

ANALYST: GAMESTOP COULD LEAD TO WIDER MARKET SWINGS

Some analysts are worried there’s something other than profit motivating moves of so-called “meme stocks.” They’re blaming internet forums, young app traders who don’t share their valuations – or perhaps their values.
“The internet has allowed decentralized bands of activists to coordinate their actions in both politics and finance, and it’s difficult to say if social media-induced trading will end up being a fad like hula hoops or is here to stay.”
So says Owen Lamont, a long-time analyst with Wellington Management’s Quantitative Investment Group. His comments came in a Goldman Sachs’s “Top of Mind” newsletter published late last week.
Lamont and many others used to more traditionally-motivated moves in markets that Wall Street insiders tend to be able to project (some say direct) and profit from don’t like what GameStop might portend.
But young retail app traders appeared to have struck again, or at least jumped in on the action, when GameStop and some other favored stocks saw wild surges this past week, in a sort of reply of a January saga.
“My concern is that this may create what academics have called ‘noise trader risk,’ in which rational traders exit asset classes that are dominated by irrational traders because the risk is too high,” Lamont opined.
In plain terms, he was calling GameStop backers… well, wacked.
But are they? Keith Gill, the now-famous GameStop stock enthusiast also known as “Roaring Kitty,” testified before Congress in February that he has perfectly legitimate enthusiasm for GME and other “meme stocks.” Some might argue if traders out there are buying stocks for “irrational” reasons, a free and open stock market takes care of that sooner or later when companies don’t perform.
Lamont says the irrational activity, as he sees it, is something that might metastasize and upend the markets in a big way. Nevermind that fiscal policy and pervasive lockdowns have been called out by many as downright lunacy that would have catastrophic economic consequences.
For big Wall Street financials and banks, their profit-making doesn’t depend so much on whether markets are up or down, but how they time getting in and out before the rest.
And that is something that is rattling the big players. According to Lamont, traders on forums like Reddit’s WallStreetBets may be operating from an ethos that is dangerous because it may be motivated by something more than just profit. 
“The more that traders are motivated by something other than profit, such as excitement, group loyalty or an anti-establishment sentiment, the more likely this is to occur,” Lamont told Goldman Sachs. “I see a good chance of rolling disruptions, especially in illiquid names or in obscure corners of the market, as well as broader market flash crashes like the one we saw in 2010.”