Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Trendpost

In its 70-page Consumers and Mobile Financial Services report, the Federal Reserve made no mention of regulation in the mobile-payments sector, or any potential threats techno non-banks could pose the public. No one on Capitol Hill seems to have noticed all the big tech companies acting like unregulated banks.

That’s because power and political influence are linked to corporate omnipresence. When a few companies quickly become politically forceful, they often use their power to reduce oversight and accountability. They build systemic risk.

We’ve seen large, politically influential firms implode and damage countless lives before. From Enron and the energy sector and WorldCom and the telecom sector in the early 2000s, to the recent banking-sector hit on the global economy, past performance is an ominous glimpse into future behavior.

It is better to be wary of issues before a crisis than suffer in the aftermath. 

 

If the government is too enamored of its new friends to care about the pitfalls their dominance could bring, we must take up the vigilance mantle for ourselves.