Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

IN EUROPE, COAL MAKES A COMEBACK

A funny thing is happening in Europe. Coal power, thought to have been rendered moribund by the push for “greener” energy, is enjoying a resurgence, and a most profitable one at that.
All actions have consequences, and Europe’s shift from coal to natural gas for power-generating and heating has made it vulnerable to shortfalls in the natural gas supply. And that’s what occurred after German regulators withheld approval of the Nordstream 2 pipeline, completed in September. 
Although critics (including the U.S.) worried that the pipeline would make Europe more dependent on Russia for energy, the pipeline would have doubled Russia’s natural gas exports to Germany. 
And, without it, natural gas prices in Europe, already high because last year’s cold winter strained supplies, have gone high enough to warrant firing up dormant coal plants. 
As reported by the Wall Street Journal on 18 November, while coal pollutes more, it’s cheaper, especially lately. Since the price of electric power in Europe is keyed to the price of natural gas, coal plants are getting top dollar—as much as four times more than previously—for energy that’s cheaper for them to produce, and the situation is predicted to continue until 2023. 
The amount of power produced in Western Europe from coal has risen, in September and October, by 20 percent over the previous year. Coal plants in Spain and the U.K. have fired up again, and even Poland, still dependent on coal for most of its electricity needs, is now exporting electricity to other central and Eastern European countries.
Under environmental policies set at the UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, the prices paid for emissions have been raised and coal should be more expensive to use, but natural gas prices have gone so high that coal is still a cheaper alternative. This essentially puts Europe in the same boat, energy-wise, as much of the developing world; see “POOR NATIONS: TOO POOR FOR CLEAN ENERGY” (15 Jun 2021).
TRENDPOST: Trends Journal predicted the rise in natural gas prices, but in terms of oil as its cheaper alternative; see “BETTING ON OIL” (22 Jun 2021).
As Gerald Celente has said, When the lights go out, environmentalism, no matter how high-minded, takes a back seat to economics. Transitioning to renewable power will remain a slow and bumpy road. The bottom line is money, and if coal is the cheapest way to generate energy, coal is what will be used.

Comments are closed.