Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Do household cleaners make infants obese?

A Canadian study suggests that the epidemic of childhood obesity may be caused in part by the chemicals in typical antibacterial household cleaners. The researchers theorize that such chemicals are absorbed through the lungs, skin, or mouth (babies taste everything) and find their way into babies’ intestines. Once there, they kill off key elements of infants’ gut bacteria, rendering children less able to process food normally. The result: overweight kids.

The analysis, done as part of the Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development (CHILD) study, looked at gut bacteria in 750 infants at ages three to four months. Then they tracked the children’s weight as they aged to three years. The scientists controlled for a range of factors such as diet, family history, and even whether a baby was born normally or by Caesarian section.

The one correlation that held steady was between an infant’s obesity and the long-term use of antibacterial cleaners. The more cleaners that were used in the home, the fatter the baby.

The results confirm those of another study, showing that toddlers with a high concentration of triclosan in the urine (a common antibacterial agent in soaps, cosmetics, and toothpaste), tended to have more body fat. Researchers also have found that piglets who inhale aerosol disinfectants over time show alterations in their digestive tracts’ array of bacteria.

The Canadian study also found that families who used more “natural” cleaning products tended to have fewer obese children.


TRENDPOST

The switch to organic foods, “nutriceuticals” and “green” cleaners will continue, as people realize the dangers that synthetic chemicals pose to living things and our environment. Marketing will more strongly emphasize products’ green credentials, and retail prices for green products will stabilize, or even drop, as demand and supply rise. Environmentally oriented investment funds and advisors, such as GreenCentury, Natural Investments LLC, and Natixis Investment Managers will benefit.

Comments are closed.