Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

NYT REPORTS OUTDOOR COVID DANGER MAY HAVE BEEN HUGELY OVERBLOWN

10 percent or 0.1 percent?
According to a May 11 New York Times report, it turns out the risks of outdoor transmission of COVID-19 may have been wildly overstated.
A month ago, a new CDC guidance on mask-wearing indicated the ratio of outdoor to indoor transmission of the virus was 90 percent to “under 10 percent.” News organizations picked up on the 10-percent number.
But that percentage “seems to be a huge exaggeration,” many epidemiologists say, according to NYT reporter David Leonhardt.
Leonhardt said the misleading number came from estimates of only a fraction of outdoor situations involving close conversations and crowded situations. But the total number of COVID cases stemming from outdoor transmissions was closer to 0.1 percent than the 10 percent figure mainstream media sources have been citing.
That 10-percent number “seems to be a huge exaggeration,” according to Dr. Muge Cevik, a virologist at the University of St. Andrews.
While reporting on the huge error, Leonhardt took pains to try to shield the CDC from blame. As The Times report said,
“This isn’t just a gotcha math issue… It is an example of how the C.D.C. is struggling to communicate effectively, and leaving many people confused about what’s truly risky. C.D.C. officials have placed such a high priority on caution that many Americans are bewildered by the agency’s long list of recommendations.”

Comments are closed.