Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

ULTA BEAUTY BEGINS “CLEAN SHEET” RETHINK

Ulta Beauty Inc., whose more than 1,200 stores dot malls and shopping centers around the U.S., has announced a “clean sheet” review to decide whether to keep stores open, remodel them, move some, or shift more operations online.
The review had been planned but the economic shutdown made it a priority, said Scott Settersten, Ulta’s CFO.
The company may close stores, renegotiate existing leases to win better terms, or take advantage of landlords’ distress to move stores to better locations, he added.
Ulta still plans to open 30 to 40 new stores this year, about half of what it had planned when the year began.
The company took a $19.5-million “impairment charge” in the first quarter due to poor performance at about 20 stores.