Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Fossil-fuel subsidies: $10 million a minute?

Global public subsidies to the fossil-fuel industry total $5.3 trillion a year, according to a May report from the International Monetary Fund. That’s $10 million a minute to feed our oil, gas and coal habit.

The report, “How Large Are Global Energy Subsidies?”, calculates not only the cost in tax breaks and other direct public subsidies to fuel producers. It also estimates the cost of health care dollars spent on illnesses directly attributable to carbon pollution, such as respiratory emergencies, as well as the cost of cleaning up brownfields, coal slag leakage into rivers, and even losses due to floods, droughts and other climatic events that scientists link to fossil-fuel use.

If these costs were built into the price of fossil fuels, the IMF contends, global carbon pollution would fall by 20 percent from today’s annual output and renewable power, such as wind and solar, would be more than competitive in price.

The IMF’s numbers have been attacked from economists who believe the report underestimates the actual cost of climate change’s damage; and from others who point out that actual global government subsidies to the fossil industry are only $492 billion a year and that it’s too hard to parse the costs of cleaning up pollution, treating pollution-related illnesses, and other damage to determine just how much of those costs can be laid at the door of fossil fuels.

 

Still, David Coady, the IMF official overseeing the report, calls the analysis “extremely robust. It is the true cost associated with fossil-fuel subsidies.”