Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

MORE MEDIA LIES

The media continues to generate false and/or deceptive information about the COVID-19 pandemic and its true scale and degree of danger… and the masses buy it.

A perfect example can be found in an article published in the Financial Times on 22 June. In the article about three medical journals being forced to retract studies they published because of concerns over poor data quality, the journalists writing the story included this statement:

 

“Since the start of what has become the worse virus pandemic for a century, scientists from microbiology to mathematics have rushed to study every aspect of the disease – to push their findings out in scientific literature.”

TRENDPOST: It’s important to note how the journalist slipped the phrase, “Since the start of what has become the worse virus pandemic for a century” into the article.

The Spanish Flu, which ended a century ago and killed up to 50 million people, compared to the coronavirus that has killed 500,000 worldwide, doesn’t count. And neither do other deadly diseases, since the author used the term “virus.”

When reporting comparisons of COVID-19 to other diseases, also absent in this and other junkstream media are percentages of the population. For example, the Spanish Flu killed 50 million people in a global population back then of 1.8 billion, or 2.78 percent of the world’s population. 

If it struck today, with the world population now 7.8 billion, 216.7 million would be dead… just a tad more than the 500,000 dead to date from the virus.

According to LiveScience.com, the HIV/AIDS virus has killed over 35 million people.

The Asian Flu killed about one million between 1957-1958.

The 1968 Hong Kong Flu killed just over one million.

It should also be noted that while the 2009 Swine Flu pandemic did not likely kill as many as COVID-19 eventually will (the best estimate from the CDC for Swine Flu deaths range between 115,000-575,000), the fact is that while COVID-19 primarily has killed the elderly and adults with significant pre-existing health issues, the Swine Flu primarily killed children and young adults.

According to a recent study published on 11 May by JAMA Pediatrics (a division of the Journal of the American Medical Association), the U.S. COVID-19 has killed two children ranging in ages from 4-16.

Comments are closed.