CDC ADMITS: OBSESSIVE SANITIZING DOES “MORE HARM THAN GOOD”

It took until 19 April of this year for the CDC to finally confirm that: 
“Disinfecting surfaces is typically not necessary, unless a sick person or someone positive for COVID-19 has been in the home within the last 24 hours.”
And now it’s official. CNN (a.k.a. the Cartoon News Network), which, for over a year, has been overtly selling COVID War Fear and Hysteria, reported that Vincent Hill, Chief of the Waterborne Disease Prevention Branch for the CDC, said the “CDC determined that the risk of surface transmission is low, and secondary to the primary routes of virus transmission through direct contact droplets and aerosols.”
Sanitizer Danger
Hill went on to warn:
“Public inquiries indicate that some people may purposely drink, inhale, or spray their skin with disinfectants, without understanding that use of disinfectants in this way can cause serious harm to their bodies…
Nineteen percent wash food products with bleach, which could lead to their consumption of bleach that isn’t washed off, which can damage the body because bleach is toxic. Eighteen percent used household cleaner on bare skin, which can damage the skin and cause rashes and burns.”  
A Year Too Late
To show just how backward, slow, and wrong the so-called “health experts” at the influential CDC have been, the Trends Journal reported back on 14 April 2020 that a top German virologist conducted a study in a town hard hit by the coronavirus that showed the germophobic obsession to clean everything in fear of the virus was not justified by the data. 
As noted in our article, “A TOUCH OF SANITY IN A WORLD GONE MAD?”:
Dr. Hendrick Streeck, professor of virology at the University of Bonn, stated research shows “no transmission of the virus in supermarkets, restaurants, or hairdressers has been proven.” He also noted that there was no evidence of living viruses on surfaces such as door handles or phones.
On 5 May 2020, the Trends Journal called attention again to the idiocy of the “be careful what you touch” mania that was sweeping the country thanks to the CDC and other health “experts.” As written in our article, “THE ‘NEW ABNORMAL’ BUSINESS MODEL”:
Under the rules of the “New ABnormal,” consultations at beauty counters will be no-touch, with samples applied to paper rather than to customers’ skin. Shoppers will be required to use hand sanitizer before trying on watches or jewelry.
Only a few fitting rooms will be open at a time, with employees cleaning them frequently. Clothes that customers have tried on will be set aside for 24 hours before being put back on display.
TRENDPOST: Decisions on what to do and how to do it in the “New ABnormal” world are clearly invented without providing any scientific data to support decisions. For example, holding clothes customers tried on for 24 hours? What data was provided that 24 hours, 48 hours… or whenever makes any practical sense?