Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

CAN’T COUNT COVID COUNTS: LIES AND DAMN LIES

The Atlantic on 17 September reported on a study, based on hospital records, that addresses the question of what is the best or most reliable figure to assess COVID’s impact and the risks it poses. Is it the number of cases, the number of persons hospitalized, or the death count?
Each of those can provide a different picture, and even within each category, it’s important to understand how they’re calculated, how the definitions vary, and therefore how misleading the numbers can be.
Case numbers, for example, often cited to show how serious a risk the virus poses, indicate only how many people have tested positive. Aside from case numbers rising simply as a result of more people getting tested, case numbers include those who have negligible symptoms, or no symptoms at all.
Trends Journal has, from the start, reported on how the case numbers are rigged and misreported. See for example, “CRUCIAL COVID DATA IGNORED BY PRESSTITUTES” (3 Nov 2020) and “PCR TEST NEEDS ADJUSTMENT” (26 Jan 2021).
And as American media celebrates that more Americans died of the virus than the Spanish Flu in 1918, the numbers are rigged. Their death count is an unreliable indicator. For one thing, it implies that COVID is the cause of death, without factoring in the comorbidities that are so often present. See “NEW ANALYSIS: CRITICAL ERRORS IN COVID DEATH TOLL” (1 Dec 2020 ) and “BUY THE COVID HYPE, AVOID THE FACTS” (9 Sept 2020). 
The death toll also doesn’t shed any light on the number of people who were seriously ill, but recovered.
TRENDPOST: So, while it is being sold that the number of people hospitalized is a reliable gauge of COVID risk, that metric is subject to any number of variables that prove the numbers are rigged. 
For one thing, it lumps together everyone admitted to a hospital who tests positive for COVID-19 (in accordance with federal requirements), even if admitted for other (serious and/or potentially fatal) conditions. Nor does it differentiate between those who have very mild vs. serious COVID symptoms. The study cited indicates that roughly half those COVID cases hospitalized in 2021 may have been admitted for some other reason entirely, or had only a mild presentation of the disease.
So even if hospitalization tallies provide a better index of the scope and risk of COVID-19, it’s important to consider that not all COVID hospitalizations are the same, and to draw the distinction as to whether a patient has been hospitalized with COVID or because of COVID.