Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

NO EVIDENCE FOR NATURAL ORIGIN OF COVID VIRUS, SAYS FORMER STATE DEPT OFFICIAL

The wall protecting the Chinese U.S. politicians and scientists about the origins of the COVID virus continues to crumble. 
Late last week, David Asher, a former State Dept. lead agent looking into the issue, told Fox News there was no credible evidence supporting a natural origin for COVID-19. What’s more, Dr. Anthony Fauci appeared to be leading efforts to steer a false narrative that helped the Chinese – and possibly his own role – in the disaster.
According to Asher:
“We were finding that despite the claims of our scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr. Fauci’s NIAID organization, there was almost no evidence that supported a natural, zoonotic evolution or source of COVID-19. The data disproportionately stacked up as we investigated that it was coming out of a lab or some supernatural source.”
Asher is an investigative specialist, and his comments add to the flood of evidence that has broken through the media and medical establishment’s version of events promoted almost since the pandemic began.
For the past year, the MSM and Big Tech social platforms, along with the WHO and the U.S. medical establishment, had virtually barred any suggestion that COVID may have come from a Wuhan bio lab.
But alt media including the Trends Journal, Zerohedge, and others have reported on the contrary mounting evidence. Among politicos, Senator Rand Paul has stood almost alone at times in his dogged pursuit of Dr. Fauci’s links to the Wuhan lab.
At a hearing a few weeks ago, the wall around Fauci’s narrative cracked in exchanges with Paul. Even mainline news outlets were forced to take notice, and, since then, the media and political blockade on evidence supporting a lab origin of the virus has lifted. 
A piece in the Wall Street Journal chronicled several Wuhan lab workers who fell ill before the official COVID timeline. New examinations of NIH documents tying Fauci to controversial chimeric made news.
Even the Biden administration has been forced to reverse their squashing of a Trump-appointed investigation into the Wuhan lab. Biden announced a new 90-day review of the evidence surrounding the issue.
Even without that investigation, there’s plenty of evidence supporting the likelihood that the COVID pandemic was engineered, and not a natural disaster. And very little science behind other possibilities.
Asher told Fox News the odds of a natural origin for COVID-19 were very long.
“That [Wuhan lab] was the epicenter of synthetic biology in the People’s Republic of China, and they were up to some very hairy stuff with synthetic biology and so-called gain-of-function techniques.”

Comments are closed.